Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 42
Determining Health and Disability Liabilities Other Than Liabilities for Incurred Claims
STANDARD OF PRACTICE
TO: Members of Actuarial Organizations Governed by the Standards of Practice of the Actuarial Standards Board and Other Persons Interested in Determining Health and Disability Liabilities Other Than Liabilities for Incurred Claims
FROM: Actuarial Standards Board (ASB)
SUBJ: Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP) No. 42
This booklet contains the final version of ASOP No. 42, Determining Health and Disability Liabilities Other Than Liabilities for Incurred Claims.
ASOP No. 5, Incurred Health and Disability Claims, specifically excluded liability items other than incurred claims, such as contract reserves, premium deficiency reserves, claim settlement expense reserves, and various reserves related to provider contracts.
This ASOP has been developed to provide guidance to actuaries regarding determination of these other liabilities. The Health Committee and the ASB determined that it is more appropriate to address these items in this standard, rather than in ASOP No. 5, because they are more diverse than claim liabilities.
The Health Committee believes that the practice of actuaries varies widely and that there may be significant differences of opinion regarding generally accepted actuarial practice for actuaries involved in determining liabilities other than incurred health and disability claims. The committee believes that this actuarial standard of practice is necessary to provide guidance on the areas of analysis that actuaries should consider. The standard is not meant to be prescriptive of specific methods or procedures, nor is it intended to require in and of itself that specific liabilities be established.
First Exposure Draft
The first exposure draft of this ASOP, then titled Determining Health and Disability Liabilities Other Than for Incurred Claims, was issued in June 2002 with a comment deadline of December 15, 2002. Twenty-five comment letters were received and considered in developing modifications that were reflected in the second exposure draft.
Second Exposure Draft
The second exposure draft of this ASOP was approved for exposure in October 2003 with a comment deadline of January 31, 2004. Seventeen comment letters were received and considered in developing the final standard. These letters showed thoughtful insight of the issues and were considered in developing the final standard of practice. A summary of the substantive issues contained in the second exposure draft comment letters and the Health Committee’s responses are provided in Appendix 2.
The most significant changes from the exposure draft were as follows:
1. Several commentators pointed out that the standard might be considered to apply to the work of actuaries on health benefits provided under pension plans and other retiree benefit plans and to certain self-insured plans. The Health Committee does not intend that this standard apply when such work is covered by another standard of practice, and added language to section 1.2, Scope, to address the issue. The Health Committee does not intend for this standard to apply to actuarial work on medical or disability benefits provided under pension plans, or to calculations for SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, or SFAS No. 112, Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits, where the determination of a liability is subject to another ASOP. The committee does intend that this standard apply to self-insured health benefit plans in the same manner as ASOP No. 5, Incurred Health and Disability Claims, with respect to the determination of liabilities. For these plans, the standard applies only to the determination of the liabilities and not to the funding of the plans.
2. The Health Committee made some modifications to clarify further that this standard is not intended to require that certain liabilities be established, but rather provides guidance to the actuary if those liabilities are established. Similarly, language related to follow-up studies was modified to clarify that such studies are not required by this standard.
The Health Committee would like to thank all those who commented on both exposure drafts.
The Health Committee would also like to thank Steven J. Abood, Michael S. Abroe, Janet M. Carstens, Robert B. Cumming, and David F. Ogden for their contribution to the development of this ASOP.
The ASB voted in March 2004 to adopt this standard.
Health Committee of the ASB
Alan D. Ford, Chairperson
Gary L. Brace John M. Friesen
Robert G. Cosway Mary J. Murley
Paul R. Fleischacker John W. C. Stark
Actuarial Standards Board
Michael A. LaMonica, Chairperson
Cecil D. Bykerk William A. Reimert
Ken W. Hartwell Lawrence J. Sher
Lew H. Nathan Karen F. Terry
Godfrey Perrott William C. Weller
The ASB establishes and improves standards of actuarial practice. These ASOPs identify what the actuary should consider, document, and disclose when performing an actuarial assignment. The ASB’s goal is to set standards for appropriate practice for the U.S.
Section 1. Purpose, Scope, Cross References, and Effective Date
This actuarial standard of practice (ASOP) provides guidance to actuaries determining health and disability liabilities other than liabilities for incurred claims. This ASOP complements ASOP No. 5, Incurred Health and Disability Claims.
This standard applies to actuaries when performing professional services in connection with determining health and disability liabilities, other than liabilities for incurred claims associated with a health benefit plan, as defined in section 2.7 of this standard, or a risk-sharing arrangement, as defined in section 2.13 of this standard. Such liabilities are described in sections 3.3–3.7, and include contract reserves, premium deficiency reserves, provider-related liabilities, claim adjustment expense liabilities, and other liabilities of insurance entities, insured or noninsured risk-assuming entities, managed care entities, health care providers, government-sponsored health benefit plans, or risk contracts. This standard also applies to actuaries determining liabilities for self-insured plans (including voluntary employees’ beneficiary association (VEBA) plans) that are not subject to other standards such as those referenced below.
This standard does not apply when such liabilities are determined in accordance with other ASOPs, such as ASOP No. 4, Measuring Pension Obligations, and ASOP No. 6, Measuring Retiree Group Benefit Obligations. Furthermore, this standard does not apply in situations where a benefit is included within a plan subject to another standard, such as a disability benefit under a life plan or a 401(h) account that is part of a pension plan.
Liabilities may be determined for purposes of financial reports, claims studies, ratemaking, or other actuarial communications. This standard does not interpret statutory or generally accepted accounting principles.
Throughout this standard, any reference to determining liability includes establishing or reviewing the liability.
If the actuary departs from the guidance set forth in this standard in order to comply with applicable law (statutes, regulations, and other legally binding authority), or for any other reason the actuary deems appropriate, the actuary should refer to section 4.
1.3 Cross References
When this standard refers to the provisions of other documents, the reference includes the referenced documents as they may be amended or restated in the future, and any successor to them, by whatever name called. If any amended or restated document differs materially from the originally referenced document, the actuary should consider the guidance in this standard to the extent it is applicable and appropriate.
1.4 Effective Date
This standard will be effective for all actuarial work involving health and disability liabilities, other than liabilities for incurred claims, performed on or after September 30, 2004.
Section 2. Definitions
The terms below are defined for use in this actuarial standard of practice.
2.1 Block of Business
All contracts of a common coverage type, demographic grouping, contract type, or other segmentation useful for estimating liabilities for actuarial purposes, or useful to a risk-assuming entity for evaluating its business.
2.2 Capitation Arrangement
An arrangement that calls for periodic payments to a provider to cover specified services to certain members of a health benefit plan regardless of the number or types of such services provided.
Carve-outs are designated services provided by specified providers, such as prescription drugs or dental, or condition-specific services such as cancer, mental health, or substance abuse treatment. Carve-outs are often provided by a separate entity specializing in that type of designated service.
2.4 Contract Period
The time period for which a contract is effective.
2.5 Contract Reserve
A liability established when a portion of the premium due prior to the valuation date is designed to pay all or a part of the claims expected to be incurred after the valuation date (sometimes referred to as an active life reserve or policy reserve). A contract reserve may or may not include a provision for the reserve for unearned premiums.
2.6 Exposure Unit
A unit by which the cost for a health benefit plan is measured. For example, an exposure unit may be a contract, an individual covered, $100 of weekly salary, or $100 of monthly benefit.
2.7 Health Benefit Plan
A contract or other financial arrangement providing medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, disability income, accidental death and dismemberment, long-term care, or other health-related benefits, whether on a reimbursement, indemnity, or service benefit basis, regardless of the form of the risk-assuming entity, including health benefit plans provided by self-insured or governmental plan sponsors.
2.8 Incentive Payment
A bonus payment to a provider, typically used to motivate efficiency or quality in patient care management, or to encourage retention of providers in a network.
A liability established when, for a period of time, the value of future premiums, current reserves, and unpaid claims liability are less than the value of future claim payments and expenses plus the anticipated liabilities at the end of the period.
Individuals, groups, or organizations providing health care services, including doctors, hospitals, physical therapists, medical equipment suppliers, etc.
A liability established to cover expected future incentive or non-claim payments or to cover the possibility of a change in the relationship between the risk-assuming entity and a provider.
2.12 Risk-Assuming Entity
The entity with respect to which the actuary is determining liabilities associated with health benefit plans or risk-sharing arrangements.
2.13 Risk-Sharing Arrangement
An arrangement involving a provider, calling for payments to or from the provider where the payment is not related to a specific service performed by that provider, and the payment is contingent upon certain financial or operational goals being achieved. Examples of risk-sharing arrangements include provider incentives, bonuses, and withholds.
Measures of rates of change, over time, of the elements affecting the determination of certain liabilities.
2.15 Unpaid Claims Liability
The value of the unpaid portion of incurred claims includes (a) unreported claims; (b) reported but unprocessed claims; and (c) processed but unpaid claims. For a risk-assuming entity’s balance sheet, the unpaid claims liability includes provision for all unpaid claims incurred during the contract period as of the current valuation date.
2.16 Valuation Date
The date as of which the liabilities are determined.
Section 3. Analysis of Issues and Recommended Practices
The determination of liabilities is fundamental to the practice of health actuaries. It is necessary for the completion of financial statements; for the analysis and projection of claim trends ; for the analysis or development of premium rates; and for the development of various management reports, regardless of the type of risk-assuming entity.
3.2 General Considerations
When determining liabilities under this standard, the actuary should consider relevant provisions of the health benefit plans or risk-sharing arrangements, business practices, and environmental factors that, in the actuary’s professional judgment, are likely to materially affect liabilities or claim trends, including those highlighted in the sections below.
When, in the actuary’s professional judgment, a representation from management is reasonable and management is an appropriate source of information about a specific item, the actuary may rely on the representation of management with respect to such item. The actuary should disclose such reliance in an appropriate actuarial communication.
3.2.1 Health Benefit Plan Provisions and Business Practices
The actuary should consider the health benefit plan provisions, including any special practices known to the actuary that are imposed by group requirements and provider arrangements and which, in the actuary’s professional judgment, materially affect the cost and frequency of claims; the level and schedule of premium rates; the ability to change premium rates; and renewability provisions. These include, for example, elimination periods, deductibles, pre-existing condition limitations, maximum service payment allowances, and managed-care restrictions.
The actuary should compare internal business practices, as described by an appropriate source, to plan provisions to determine whether there are material differences between the plan provisions and actual operation of the plan, such as differences in definitions of payment allowances, incurral dating methods, and benefit interpretations, and consider how such differences are likely to affect the determination of claim costs and claim liabilities.
3.2.2 Risk-Sharing Arrangement Provisions
The actuary should consider the risk-sharing arrangement provisions, including any special requirements for networks or providers, which are known to the actuary and, in the actuary’s professional judgment, are likely to materially affect the financial results of the arrangement. These include, for example, allowances for number of enrolled lives included, the results of membership satisfaction surveys, and actual usage of certain facilities. The actual payments may be defined by internal business practices, contracts, and plan provisions.
3.2.3 Economic Influences
Economic conditions may affect the frequency and cost of claims. The actuary should consider such factors as changes in expected trends, managed-care contracts, provider networks, provider fee schedules, and medical practices to the extent such changes, in the actuary’s professional judgment, are material individually or in the aggregate. In addition, economic conditions may influence such factors as continuation of disability, cost shifting, and frequency of elective procedures performed in recessionary periods or prior to plan termination.
3.2.4 Risk Characteristics and Organizational Practices by Block of Business
The actuary should consider how marketing, underwriting, and other business practices can influence the types of risks accepted. Furthermore, the pattern of growth or contraction and relative maturity of a block of business can influence liabilities. Claims administration practices can influence claim rates and trends and in turn influence liabilities.
3.2.5 Legislative Requirements
Governmental mandates can influence the provision of new benefits, risk characteristics, care management practices, rating and underwriting practices, or claims processing practices. The actuary should consider relevant legislative and regulatory changes as they pertain to determination of liabilities.
The actuary should consider the pertinent benefits, payment arrangements, and separate reporting of those benefits subject to carve-outs in trend analysis and determination of a risk-assuming entity’s liabilities.
3.2.7 Special Considerations for Long-Term Products
Certain health benefit plans provide for long-term medical or disability benefits. Some examples are cancer, long-term care, and long-term disability policies. The actuary should consider the benefits available in these health benefit plans, such as lump-sum, fixed, or variable payments for services; provisions such as cost of living adjustments and inflation protections; payment differences based on institutional or home-based care; social insurance integration; and the criteria for benefit eligibility.
3.2.8 Reinsurance Arrangements
The actuary should appropriately reflect the effect of reinsurance arrangements in determining liabilities. In particular, the actuary should take into account the extended reporting or recovery periods and delayed collectibility often associated with certain types of reinsurance.
The actuary should consider whether an explicit liability for expenses should be established, or whether a particular liability implicitly provides for future expenses.
3.2.10 Consistency of Bases
The actuary should use consistent bases for determining related liabilities and reserves, including those not covered by this standard, such as incurred health and disability claims, unless it would be inappropriate to do so.
3.3 Considerations for Determining Contract Reserves
The actuary should establish a contract reserve when such a reserve is required. For example, contract reserves are typically established for entry-age-rated health benefit plans (where premium rates are based on entry age and may be level over the lifetime of the contract), or where flat premium rate guarantees or premium rate change limitations apply for multiple-year periods. The actuary may perform the valuation on a seriatim basis, using grouping techniques, or a combination of both. When determining contract reserves, the actuary should consider the following:
The actuary should use assumptions that are reasonable in the aggregate. The actuary should take into account the following assumptions and any other assumptions that the actuary deems appropriate:
a. Interest Rates: The actuary should use interest rates in the present value calculation that are reasonable and consistent with the purpose for which the reserve is being calculated.
b. Morbidity: The actuary should use morbidity assumptions that reflect the underlying risk. These assumptions may reflect factors such as age, gender, and marital status of the insured as well as the elimination period and dependent status. In addition, the actuary should take into account the wearing away of durational effects such as risk selection and pre-existing condition limitations, changes in health benefit plans, changes in provider agreements, adverse selection due to premium rate increases and plan design, and other factors that, in the actuary’s professional judgment, materially affect future claim payments. The impact of these items may be recognized by a set of assumptions that varies over time.
c. Persistency: The actuary should consider using persistency or termination assumptions that include both involuntary terminations, such as deaths and disablements and voluntary terminations, as appropriate. Voluntary termination assumptions, if any, should reflect the expected impact of future premium rate increases.
d. Expenses: The actuary should consider whether an assumption is appropriate for expenses such as maintenance, acquisition, and claim settlement, depending on the purpose for which the reserve is being calculated.
e. Trend: The actuary should consider trend assumptions for inflation, utilization, morbidity, and expense rates that are consistent with the purpose for which the reserve is being calculated.
The actuary should consider whether an assumption may be appropriate to reflect premium rate changes in the reserve calculation. The actuary should use a premium rate change assumption that is reasonable in relation to the projected claims costs and the manner in which the rate change will be implemented (for example, on a given date for an entire block of business or on the next policy anniversary). This assumption should take into account factors such as market conditions, regulatory restrictions, and rate guarantees.
3.3.3 Previously Established Assumptions for Contract Reserves
The actuary may determine that previously established assumptions are not appropriate and may change them in accordance with the standards of the financial statements in which the reserves are reported. The actuary should follow the process set forth in section 3.3.1 when establishing new contract reserve assumptions for future valuation dates.
3.3.4 Valuation Method
For a new policy form, in addition to the assumptions discussed above, the actuary may need to determine the valuation method. The most common valuation methods are the gross premium method, the net level premium method and the full preliminary term (one- or two-year) method. Except where the valuation method is prescribed, the actuary should choose an appropriate method for the intended use of the reserve, such as in statutory financial statements or analysis of operating income. When not using a net level premium method, the actuary should consider the expense structure, such as higher first-year costs, in selecting the valuation method.
The actuary should establish a premium deficiency reserve when such a reserve is required. Premium deficiency reserves are typically established for financial reporting purposes. They may also be established for other purposes such as management reporting. The actuary commonly performs a gross premium valuation in order to determine whether or not a deficiency exists.
3.4.1 General Considerations
When determining deficiency reserves, the actuary should take into account the following:
a. Assumptions in the Aggregate: The actuary should use assumptions that are reasonable in the aggregate.
b. Exposure: The actuary should consider reasonable increases and decreases in exposure units over the time period of the calculation in the premium deficiency reserve calculation. This parameter should reflect changes due to such factors as mortality, lapses, and the impact of expected premium rate changes.
c. Premium Rate Changes: The actuary should use a premium rate change assumption that is reasonable in relation to the projected claims costs and the risk-assuming entity’s expectations. This assumption should take into account factors such as market conditions, regulatory restrictions, and rate guarantees.
d. Claim Trend: The actuary should take into account the wearing away of durational effects such as risk selection and pre-existing condition limitations, changes in provider agreements, adverse selection due to premium rate increases and plan design, and other factors that affect future claim payments.
e. Risk-Sharing Arrangement: The actuary should take into account risk-sharing arrangements. If the actuary anticipates there will be a payout for risk-sharing arrangements associated with a block of business that is being tested for premium deficiency, the actuary should treat the amount of the payout as an expense. Some of these arrangements require providers to share in losses as well as gains. If such an agreement is in effect and the actuary anticipates there will be losses associated with the block of business being tested, the actuary should include the amount due from the providers to offset the losses only to the extent that the actuary reasonably expects the amount due to be collectible.
f. Interest Rates: The actuary should use interest rates in the present value calculation that are reasonable and consistent with the purpose for which the reserve is being calculated.
g. Reinsurance: The actuary should consider the expected effects of reinsurance and changes in reinsurance premiums in determining the premium deficiency reserve.
h. Taxes: The actuary should consider the effect of losses assumed in the calculation of the premium deficiency reserve on the risk-assuming entity’s taxes and may include a tax credit in the calculations where appropriate.
i. Expenses: The actuary should consider total expenses of the risk-assuming entity in establishing a premium deficiency reserve and should consider whether the expenses allocated to the block of business are reasonable for the purpose of determining premium deficiency reserves.
3.4.2 Additional Considerations for Financial Reporting
When determining premium deficiency reserves for financial reporting, the actuary should consider the following:
a. Blocks of Business: In order to determine whether or not a premium deficiency exists, the actuary should consider blocks of business in a manner consistent with applicable financial reporting requirements. The characteristics of a block of business may include, but are not limited to, benefit type (for example, major medical, preferred provider organization, or capitated managed care), contract type (for example, group or individual policies), demographic grouping (for example, group size or geographical area), and length of rate guarantee period. Whatever criteria are used, a block of business should be large enough so that its financial results are material relative to the risk-assuming entity as a whole. The actuary may need to establish a premium deficiency reserve for a block of business where a premium deficiency exists even if the contract period has not started.
b. Time Period: The actuary should take into account any applicable law, regulation, or other binding authority in establishing the time period of the calculation. The valuation date is the beginning of the time period used to project losses from a block of business. The end of the time period is generally the earlier of the end of the contract period or the point at which the block no longer requires a premium deficiency reserve.
Provider-related liabilities may arise for a risk-assuming entity as a provider or a non- provider. Risk-sharing arrangements create potential liabilities for both parties while provider incentive payments create potential liability to the risk-assuming entity offering such provisions to their providers. Finally, capitation arrangements may create a provider-related liability for either party. When determining provider-related liabilities, the actuary should consider the following:
3.5.1 Non-Provider Risk-Assuming Entities
The actuary should consider the relevant contractual arrangements with providers to determine whether the contractual arrangements require a liability to be held by the risk-assuming entity.
The actuary should consider whether a provider-related liability for contracts in effect or not fully settled as of the valuation date should be determined. In determining the liability, the actuary should consider any amounts due from the provider, the overall financial condition of the provider, and the likelihood of collecting amounts due.
Similarly, the actuary should consider whether the risk of a provider failing or leaving a network creates a need to determine a liability for the contingency of the payment by the risk-assuming entity of higher capitations or fees for services while a replacement provider is identified and suitable arrangements are concluded.
3.5.2 Provider Risk-Assuming Entities
The actuary should consider relevant contractual arrangements with other providers as well as non- provider risk-assuming entities to determine whether the contractual arrangements require a liability to be held. One primary source of potential liability between providers is the receipt of capitation by one provider with payments due to other providers using fee-for-service.
3.5.3 Risk-Sharing and Capitation Arrangements
The actuary should consider the nature of any risk-sharing and capitation arrangements in determining whether to establish a provider-related liability. The actuary should consider stop-loss provisions, if any, included in the risk sharing or capitation arrangements when establishing a provider-related liability.
3.5.4 Provider Financial Condition
When a risk-assuming entity shares risk with a provider under a risk-sharing or capitation arrangement, the actuary should determine, to the extent practical, whether the provider’s overall financial condition will allow it to meet its obligations, and, if not, adjust the liability accordingly. To the extent that these liabilities are not otherwise included in the claim liabilities of the risk-assuming entity, such liabilities should be included in the provider-related liabilities.
3.5.5 Provider Incentive Payments
If a provider agreement calls for incentive payments to be made to a provider if certain conditions are met, such as quality of care standards or claim targets, the actuary should consider whether the risk-assuming entity should hold a liability for those payments.
3.6 Claim Adjustment Expense Liabilities
The actuary should determine a liability for claim adjustment expenses associated with unpaid claims, unless such liabilities are included in the liability for unpaid claims or otherwise provided for appropriately.
3.7 Other Liabilities
The actuary may not always be responsible for determining certain other liabilities. However, the actuary may be asked to assist in the determination of or opine on the adequacy of certain of these other liabilities. The following are examples of such liabilities:
3.7.1 Liabilities for Payments to State Pools
When involved in determining liabilities for payments to state pools, the actuary should consider whether adequate provision has been made for payments due under state assessment pools, such as insolvency pools, risk-sharing pools, or other arrangements.
3.7.2 Reserves for Unearned Premiums
When involved in determining reserves for unearned premiums, the actuary should consider whether adequate provision has been made for liabilities associated with coverage during the period when the premium will be earned.
3.7.3 Liabilities for Dividends and Experience Refunds
When involved in determining liabilities for dividends and experience refunds, the actuary should consider whether adequate provision has been made for dividends or experience refunds payable under the provisions of a health benefit plan.
3.8 Follow-Up Studies
The actuary may be called upon to conduct follow-up studies that involve performing tests of reasonableness of the prior period liability estimates and the methods used over time. When conducting such follow-up studies, the actuary should, to the extent practical, do the following:
a. collect sufficient data to perform such studies;
b. perform studies in the aggregate or for appropriate blocks of business; and
c. utilize the results, if appropriate, in preparing current liability estimates.
3.9 Margin for Uncertainty
Recognizing the fact that liabilities are an estimate of the true liabilities that will emerge, the actuary should consider what margin for uncertainty, if any, might be appropriately included.
3.10 Data Requirements
The expansion of health benefit coverages and the variety of organizations offering health benefit coverages have increased the volume, type, detail, and the frequency of data needs by the actuary. The actuary should refer to ASOP No. 23, Data Quality, when dealing with data requirements.
The actuary should document the methods, assumptions, procedures, and the sources of the data used. The documentation should be in a form such that another actuary qualified in the same practice area could assess the reasonableness of the actuary’s work.
Section 4. Communications and Disclosures
4.1 Communications and Disclosures
When issuing actuarial communications under this standard, the actuary should refer to ASOP No. 41, Actuarial Communications. In particular, such actuarial communications should disclose the following items:
a. the sources of information;
b. the extent of reliance on information supplied by others;
c. limitations on the use of the actuarial work product;
d. the need for any follow-up studies;
e. any unresolved concerns the actuary may have about the information that could have a material effect on the actuarial work product;
f. the disclosure in ASOP No. 41, section 4.2, if any material assumption or method was prescribed by applicable law (statutes, regulations, and other legally binding authority);
g. the disclosure in ASOP No. 41, section 4.3, if the actuary states reliance on other sources and thereby disclaims responsibility for any material assumption or method selected by a party other than the actuary; and
h. the disclosure in ASOP No. 41, section 4.4, if, in the actuary’s professional judgment, the actuary has otherwise deviated materially from the guidance of this ASOP.
4.2 Reliance on Others
The actuary may rely on information, including data, supplied by others. In doing so, the actuary should disclose both the fact and the extent of such reliance in an appropriate actuarial communication. The accuracy and comprehensiveness of the information are the responsibility of those who supply it.
Appendix 1 – Background and Current Practices
Note: This appendix is provided for informational purposes, but is not part of the standard of practice.
Health and disability liabilities other than incurred claims are important to many lines of health and disability business. New forms of these liabilities arose during the 1980s and especially the 1990s with the rapid increase in managed care provider risk arrangements. The increasing attention to financial statements has enhanced the importance of other liabilities such as contract reserves and premium deficiency reserves.
Actuaries have been able to obtain guidance on when statutory reserves are required, how to reserve for health coverages and how to document those reserves from various publications of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. The primary publications are the Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual, the Health Insurance Reserves Model Regulation and the Health Reserves Guidance Manual. Similar guidance on when liabilities are required by generally accepted accounting principles is available in Statements of Financial Accounting Standards. Determining liabilities may be necessary or useful in situations other than financial statement reporting, such as the acquisition of a block of a business or in experience analysis.
Appendix 2 – Comments on the Second Exposure Draft and Committee Responses
The second exposure draft of this standard, Determining Health and Disability Liabilities Other Than Liabilities for Incurred Claims, was exposed for review in October 2003, with a comment deadline of January 31, 2004. Seventeen comment letters were received. The Health Committee of the ASB carefully considered all comments received. Many helpful ideas and suggestions were offered in the comment letters and are reflected in the standard as appropriate.
Click here to view Appendix 2 in its entirety.